Skip to content
Menu
What This Means1 min leftShow sections

Plaintiffs Fail to Float Claim Past District Court

The U.S. District Court has determined that float income is not a plan asset. This may be the last we hear about ERISA claims involving float.

David Witz1 min read63 words

The U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts in In re Fidelity ERISA Float Litigation has determined that float income is not a plan asset.

What This Means

By determining float income is not a plan asset, the court found retention of float income is not a prohibited transaction. However, float is still a form of indirect compensation that must be considered under 408(b)(2) responsibilities.

See how PlanTools keeps the record.

Scoring, the IPS, and the quarterly review, filed together and dated.